Tuesday, January 26, 2010

The Boarded Window: Murlock's relationship with nature

Taken from Sheldon Goldfarb:


From the beginning of the story we are told that Murlock lived alone in the forest. Of course, before his wife died, he lived with her, but it is interesting that the main events of the plot are set in motion by Murlock’s being away “gunning in a distant part of the forest” while his wife falls ill. He is perhaps too much apart, even from his wife.

He also seems to have an excessively antagonistic relationship to the natural world around him, as is indicated by his being off “gunning.” And earlier, in describing Murlock’s attempts at farming, the narrator makes him sound violent by talking of “the ravage wrought by [Murlock’s] ax.” The narrator also refers to Murlock’s zeal for agriculture as a “flame,” which makes him sound like a danger to the forest, although it is true that his flame is “failing” and “expiring in penitential ashes.”

Murlock had arrived in the area “young, strong and full of hope” and had begun “laying sturdily about with his ax to hew out a farm” while also using his rifle to shoot wild game. After his wife’s death, he lets the forest retake the land he had cleared for a farm, perhaps feeling guilty about his previous actions (hence the term “penitential” in describing what happened to his zeal for farming).

Perhaps what the story is trying to suggest in all this is that Murlock was both too much apart from other people (or civilization) and too antagonistic to nature. And what happens to his wife is then some sort of punishment, or a revenge taken by civilization and nature together. The panther is then a symbol of the world’s hostility towards those who fail to interact with it normally, who push it away or attack it. Similarly, the narrator’s throwing of stones at Murlock’s cabin seems to represents the world’s naturally hostile response to one who has kept himself too much to himself.

41 comments:

  1. Very thoughtful Mr. P. I agree with you strongly that the panther was a symbol of vengence. Yes, a very interesting analysis. INDEED!

    ReplyDelete
  2. one i do agree that the panter was a symbol of vengence and two i don't that the wife suddenly died of some sort of punishment it was never a punishment

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ah! Very good to see Leeam come up with a similar idealogy to mine!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hung, as I read your posts, I can hear your British accent ringing in the back of my head. :D AHHHH.

    The story clearly suggests a hidden meaning that goes further beyond the simple plot of a panther kill. This could have been the wakening that Murlock really needed. His wife seems innocent enough, so she couldn't have died for no apparent reason.

    ReplyDelete
  5. this is a very interesting story, it engages the readers to think and imagine.
    there are lots of way in which ppl can interpret it: the panther kill can be a punishment, maybe it is just unlucky for Murlock's wife, or maybe it's the danger one must face settling down and being alone in a gloomy forest.
    i like the wife, can't imagine how she could bite off the animal's ear =D

    ReplyDelete
  6. btw,this critical piece is not written by Mr.P but by
    Sheldon Goldfarb, don't mistaken the writter Hung

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is a very interesting story and was quite enjoying. Some parts were rather difficult to understand but it was okay though. Th one I really thought that was fun is Murlock's wife. The panther kill can be a punishment. I Agree with son. It's the danger one must face setting down and being alone in that scary forest.

    ReplyDelete
  8. i got nothing to say. totally agree with evferybody

    ReplyDelete
  9. Same her tooo i agree with everybody but soomin i think for the rest of english this year when we comment on all the different stories like this one you would say " some parts are so difficult to understand" or maybe " i don't get it!!!!!" thats all i have to say bye bye.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What are we arguing about? Im confised...

    ReplyDelete
  11. finish the rewrite thingy, i think?

    ReplyDelete
  12. i agree w u guys (: vrythin u said really meks sense (: BYE

    ReplyDelete
  13. btw Hung, it was from http://www.answers.com/topic/the-boarded-window-story-8 Mr Pollicutt didnt write it himself mwuahahahhahahah BYE

    ReplyDelete
  14. I agree with Son, i think this story is very interesting, too!!!! Cos it leaves the readers to imagine what is going on in the story! For example, the panther kills the wife is a punishment or just the unfaithful of Murlock's wife or the danger of the unbroken forest!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. hahaha!!! vy actually found out where mr pollicutt got it from hahha. =P and i agree wif leeam. the wife dying as a punishment for him doesn't make any sense

    ReplyDelete
  16. yea it does. Murlock cut downs tress and shot innocent animals in the forest, and later on the panther come to his house and chewed up his innocent wife. Blood for blood...
    that seems pretty fair to me Lady random

    ReplyDelete
  17. btw when i said "tress" i meant trees

    ReplyDelete
  18. I think that it is not a coincidence that when murlock is off 'gunning in a distant part of the forest', his wife falls ill. By 'gunning away', Goldfarb implies that Murlock is damaging the forest, 'upsetting' nature, and so it bites back by infecting his wife (who is one of the dearest things to him) with a disease. It is maybe not that Murlock feels far apart from his wife, but maybe something about his past makes him want to be alone in the depths of the forest, taking his anger out shooting game. Nature might 'summon' the illness or the panther to show him that his actions are unacceptable.

    The way that Murlock always seems to be violent with everything around him may reflect his anger or his emptiness, and he might be trying to relive his pain by moving out into the middle of nowhere and violently thrashing things.

    ReplyDelete
  19. O.O i had to read tht five times to get it... but y should the wife suffer? mayb the wife getting ill was meant to get murlock to actually go out of the forest to get help and then it might convince him tht being among ppl is actually healthier so tht he would move out of the forest therefore, not thrashing nature anymore. but murlock decided to cure her himself and tht resulted in her almost death. so the wife wasnt really meant to die. she was just meant to fall ill so tht murlock would go out of the forest into the city to get help and hopefully stay there forever. :) i just sounded so smart lol

    ReplyDelete
  20. wat are you guys arguing about any way?
    well i think i agree with most people, i think the panter is s symbol of vengance, i disagree with michelle wat if the wife also liked it in the woods by them self and i agree with linus as well wat goes ariund comes around :)

    ReplyDelete
  21. And hung its funny when you wirte you write very poshly as well lol

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hey I'm from another class.

    @Danny: Yeah I agree with you. It's awkward when people use too formal language when commenting posts. I mean it just doesn't sound natural. No offense, Hung.

    I've just finished reading it. Good story.

    Bye ;)

    ReplyDelete
  23. danny i didnt say tht the wife liked it or didnt like it in the woods... i said tht the wife needed attention from the city WHEN SHE WAS SICK. omg if ur gona insult my comment at least do it rite

    ReplyDelete
  24. Dude, who is this "Khuong Do"?
    I dont agree with anybody but I do think that the writer makes the ending very unsuspecting. I mean you couldnt have guessed in the end the wife gets killed by a panther and it drags her body away and the wife has a chewed panther ear...

    ReplyDelete
  25. Btw, Mr.Pollicutt did mention that he copied Sheldon Goldfard Hung.

    "Taken from Sheldon Goldfarb"

    ReplyDelete
  26. SangWook, I'm from another class. But that doesn't mean I don't have the right to comment as the Mr Pollicutt changed the settings so that everyone could comment.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I really don't think living away from other people should by punished because it it their own freedom to live away from other people and killing the wife was really a bit terrible because wife is the person that he loves, but taking her away is really terrible
    But I'm not sure whether I'm writing the correct thing or not

    ReplyDelete
  28. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  29. i agreee with jae ho. Living away from other people shouldn't be punished because that was their choice!! Other people can't punish him by living away from them. But the fact that he was apart even from his wife when she was dead does not sounds good. Even he hates people, he have to care about his wife because wife is the person that husband has to love.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I like Aadit's and Linus' comments here in particular.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I agree with Linus. Murlock lives in the forest with his wife away from other people. He doesn’t even feel anything or cries when his wife falls ill and when she dies. And he kills the animals as the panther bites his wife. The wife has to suffer it because she’s innocent just like the nature that’s why Murlock is also in role of his wife’s death.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Why are some of the comments "removed by the post author"?
    And by the way Khuong, it's so nice to see somebody who comments using proper grammar, syntax, capital letters and non-slang full words!

    Who invented internet language?
    Like: "I wish i cud write like dat, wat level wud it b? dis so good sum words i dun really get, i neva tot dat Murlock wud b da narrator's grandpa.... BYE i gotta go 2 toilet seriously BEE WAII EEE"

    ReplyDelete
  33. Haha, Aadit - the grammar Nazi :P.

    Could it be that when Murlock's already had a kind of ominous feeling that he is being punished even before the panther - as suggested, the actual symbol of vengeance - comes? For example, when his wife dies, he does not weep or anything, even though she is one of the dearest things to him. Could it be that he knows, by the instinct deep inside himself, that he deserves his wife's death for destroying nature?

    Just my thoughts...

    ReplyDelete
  34. Aadit, we don't even know what syntax means, really...

    And I totally agree with Linus ;)

    ReplyDelete
  35. It could actually be true to a point, where Aadit mentioned that Murlock's wife never really existed, and was only a conjured figment of his imagination. This is logical in its own sense, because there were no known records of her ever having been there, and Murlock also seemed to be a bit queer in the head after her 'death.'
    He did not weep over her passing, and treated it as though she had never meant anything to him. The story explains it as being a side effect of the shock that comes with grief, but you could always perceive it to be something else.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Conclusion: we can only conjecture everything in this story. There's no right or wrong answer. All are due to one's own interpretations.

    ReplyDelete